|
See what Corrambo and Fappy posted, Saddam was loved in Iraq, and kept the region in check, him and Qaddafi have been falsely demonized
Then we have to answer two questions
1. Who was he good for?
For Iraq? We know he spent all its income for what turned out to be nothing and instead of developing society to nly devided and islanised the majority. Let alone permnant damage to Iraqi soil and foreign relations.
Stability? In order to maintain his corrupted way of governing he had to keep the oil prices high even if he had to provoke war for it
People? He got Iraq involved in so many scandals and wars he couldnt keep social benifits anymore no matter how much oil he had. Let alone the fact that he neglected Iraq and considering its huge oil reserves and small population was suppose to become super developed under any medicore leadership.
Also remember that social benifits started inbefore it and the reason he is remembered for it was because Iraq used to be poor nation before oil was disovered. Compared to poorer western nations its nothing impressive
West? He provoked 3 middle eastern conflict and even though he contributed to the arms industry planted the seeds for Al Qaeda and ISIS and funded terror everywhere
2. Could he maintain this system for long? History says nay
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
Do me a favour You cant realie on that cliche everytime history doesnt suit your agenda.
We know that despite they had more income from oil nearly than anyone their citizens finished up poorer than ever. That the number of religious muslims has grown in society that had secular revolution. That the war that Sadaam provoked made economy shrink back and they couldnt pay debts. We have bible descriptions. Thousands of handwrites eversince and pictures of rich soil. What is left of that is poor desert.
What information could they fake to make Sadaam look bad. Its all infront of us
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
Do me a favour You cant realie on that cliche everytime history doesnt suit your agenda.
We know that despite they had more income from oil nearly than anyone their citizens finished up poorer than ever. That the number of religious muslims has grown in society that had secular revolution. That the war that Sadaam provoked made economy shrink back and they couldnt pay debts. We have bible descriptions. Thousands of handwrites eversince and pictures of rich soil. What is left of that is poor desert.
What information could they fake to make Sadaam look bad. Its all infront of us
Take erdogan as example.
Probably same thing gonna happen to Turkey as what happened to Iraq and Libya, or atleast they are trying to.
What more proof do you want bro? You've witnessed all yourself. Almost every fucking country besides america with its veto's, israel with jew moneys and france with their dickridding, is putting up the same front. What the fuck does a fucking America has to do in some country in the middle east 20000 km further?
America that wants a fucking Kurdistan, yet it uses its veto's to stop the existence of palestine, while its the same fucking example. I think its all verry clear what the agenda of America is, and that is to create a Kurdistan and use it as its puppet in the middle east, taking the most important oilfields from syria, iran and iraq as the mainland of Kurdistan. Proofs have been given that those terrorist groups are funded and armored by mostly the western countries, yet people call those people fighting against them the true terrorists and dictators. Lmao.
Stop with your bullshit, because you try to sound so fucking smartass, just accept the fact that this world is fuckedup with people like that in power. Soon the chinese will overflow us with communism anyways, so you enjoy while you can.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Waffel, 25.01.2018 at 14:55
Take erdogan as example.
Probably same thing gonna happen to Turkey as what happened to Iraq and Libya, or atleast they are trying to.
What more proof do you want bro? You've witnessed all yourself. Almost every fucking country besides america with its veto's, israel with jew moneys and france with their dickridding, is putting up the same front. What the fuck does a fucking America has to do in some country in the middle east 20000 km further?
America that wants a fucking Kurdistan, yet it uses its veto's to stop the existence of palestine, while its the same fucking example. I think its all verry clear what the agenda of America is, and that is to create a Kurdistan and use it as its puppet in the middle east, taking the most important oilfields from syria, iran and iraq as the mainland of Kurdistan. Proofs have been given that those terrorist groups are funded and armored by mostly the western countries, yet people call those people fighting against them the true terrorists and dictators. Lmao.
Stop with your bullshit, because you try to sound so fucking smartass, just accept the fact that this world is fuckedup with people like that in power. Soon the chinese will overflow us with communism anyways, so you enjoy while you can.
Waffel read again my comment and your response jesus fucking christ
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Waffel, 25.01.2018 at 14:55
Take erdogan as example.
Probably same thing gonna happen to Turkey as what happened to Iraq and Libya, or atleast they are trying to.
What more proof do you want bro? You've witnessed all yourself. Almost every fucking country besides america with its veto's, israel with jew moneys and france with their dickridding, is putting up the same front. What the fuck does a fucking America has to do in some country in the middle east 20000 km further?
America that wants a fucking Kurdistan, yet it uses its veto's to stop the existence of palestine, while its the same fucking example. I think its all verry clear what the agenda of America is, and that is to create a Kurdistan and use it as its puppet in the middle east, taking the most important oilfields from syria, iran and iraq as the mainland of Kurdistan. Proofs have been given that those terrorist groups are funded and armored by mostly the western countries, yet people call those people fighting against them the true terrorists and dictators. Lmao.
Stop with your bullshit, because you try to sound so fucking smartass, just accept the fact that this world is fuckedup with people like that in power. Soon the chinese will overflow us with communism anyways, so you enjoy while you can.
Waffel read again my comment and your response jesus fucking christ
no
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Do me a favour You cant realie on that cliche everytime history doesnt suit your agenda.
We know that despite they had more income from oil nearly than anyone their citizens finished up poorer than ever. That the number of religious muslims has grown in society that had secular revolution. That the war that Sadaam provoked made economy shrink back and they couldnt pay debts. We have bible descriptions. Thousands of handwrites eversince and pictures of rich soil. What is left of that is poor desert.
What information could they fake to make Sadaam look bad. Its all infront of us
Not a cliche, it's true lmao, also what bible lolz, you're obviously biased on the matter js
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Not a cliche, it's true lmao, also what bible lolz, you're obviously biased on the matter js
If its true tell me what information could be faked or was faked you cant claim for conspiracy without providing logical explanation.
Also for the bible it was suppose to mark the fact it was famous being rich green soil before Sadaam drained and poulled the marshesand created desert. There are thousands if addidtional sources
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesopotamian_Marshes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draining_of_the_Mesopotamian_Marshes
At last. Writing that comments seems like desperate way to ditch arguement while you ignore the rest of the subject and looking after reasons to mock me
Also biased? Making Sadaam look worse than he is does not serve or promote me in any way so stop gocusing on the guy you are argueing and start trying to save your arguements
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Not a cliche, it's true lmao, also what bible lolz, you're obviously biased on the matter js
If its true tell me what information could be faked or was faked you cant claim for conspiracy without providing logical explanation.
Also for the bible it was suppose to mark the fact it was famous being rich green soil before Sadaam drained and poulled the marshesand created desert. There are thousands if addidtional sources
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesopotamian_Marshes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draining_of_the_Mesopotamian_Marshes
At last. Writing that comments seems like desperate way to ditch arguement while you ignore the rest of the subject and looking after reasons to mock me
Also biased? Making Sadaam look worse than he is does not serve or promote me in any way so stop gocusing on the guy you are argueing and start trying to save your arguements
My arguements are there and simply exposed for proper aprehension by the viewer. And you're indeed biased for ethnic,religious, societary and historical reasons in a way tbh, no offense.
Guess this is what Voltaire wishes when he said: "I may disagree with you but I'll do everything I can to allow you to dsicuss what you want" or something like that xd
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Waffel, 25.01.2018 at 15:07
no
That block of political bs you stacked in one sad sad message has zero relevance to do with my comment or the subject. And does not apply to me arguements you quoted in any eay. and yet you insist it I will take it seriously. Speaking of trying to be smartass.
I really hope you were drunk and thats not your pernmnaant form
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
My arguements are there and simply exposed for proper aprehension by the viewer. And you're indeed biased for ethnic,religious, societary and historical reasons in a way tbh, no offense.
Guess this is what Voltaire wishes when he said: "I may disagree with you but I'll do everything I can to allow you to dsicuss what you want" or something like that xd
Again people opinion about Iraq does not bother me in any way. If anything its the double standart of people like you and Commando.
And no. Saying the guy who made counter arguments shouldnt be listened because he is a Jew does not mean you are properly defending your arguments are proving yourself fit to judge situation.
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Waffel, 25.01.2018 at 15:07
no
That block of political bs you stacked in one sad sad message has zero relevance to do with my comment or the subject. And does not apply to me arguements you quoted in any eay. and yet you insist it I will take it seriously. Speaking of trying to be smartass.
I really hope you were drunk and thats not your pernmnaant form
Bruh the irony, you should read most of your own comments, they mostly have nothing to do with any subject either or apply to any arguements,
Also look at the question you asked, a little tip for you: your last sentence. You'll understand my comment then , Dont play the innocent man.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Waffel, 26.01.2018 at 06:09
Bruh the irony, you should read most of your own comments, they mostly have nothing to do with any subject either or apply to any arguements,
Also look at the question you asked, a little tip for you: your last sentence. You'll understand my comment then , Dont play the innocent man.
I am not going to enter new debate about Palestine and Kurdistan in here. especially not with you after you ditched 3 stacked threads about it.
If i am so dumb let me see the answers for my question
1. What facts the 'mainstream' has changed to rewrite history
2. What did Iraq earn from Sadaam?
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Void_ Postări: 97 De la: Japonia
|
Jews are to blame for the war in Syria
----
All mortals must be destroyed...
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Void_, 27.01.2018 at 11:07
Jews are to blame for everything
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Void_, 27.01.2018 at 11:07
Jews are to blame for everything
God you're such a roleplayer noob
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Afrin is captured in the anniversary of Turkish victory against allied invasion force in Gallipoli.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
Turkey won, captured afrin completely. gg kurdish independence, it was good while it last
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
See what Corrambo and Fappy posted, Saddam was loved in Iraq, and kept the region in check, him and Qaddafi have been falsely demonized
Then we have to answer two questions
1. Who was he good for?
For Iraq? We know he spent all its income for what turned out to be nothing and instead of developing society to nly devided and islanised the majority. Let alone permnant damage to Iraqi soil and foreign relations.
Stability? In order to maintain his corrupted way of governing he had to keep the oil prices high even if he had to provoke war for it
People? He got Iraq involved in so many scandals and wars he couldnt keep social benifits anymore no matter how much oil he had. Let alone the fact that he neglected Iraq and considering its huge oil reserves and small population was suppose to become super developed under any medicore leadership.
Also remember that social benifits started inbefore it and the reason he is remembered for it was because Iraq used to be poor nation before oil was disovered. Compared to poorer western nations its nothing impressive
West? He provoked 3 middle eastern conflict and even though he contributed to the arms industry planted the seeds for Al Qaeda and ISIS and funded terror everywhere
2. Could he maintain this system for long? History says nay
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
>history is written by the victors
>churchill
it was napoleon who said it first not some obese british drunkard.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Don't mind Waffel. he is pissed because he is no longer the only one with 1234 elo
----
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Guest, 03.04.2018 at 04:05
See what Corrambo and Fappy posted, Saddam was loved in Iraq, and kept the region in check, him and Qaddafi have been falsely demonized
Then we have to answer two questions
1. Who was he good for?
For Iraq? We know he spent all its income for what turned out to be nothing and instead of developing society to nly devided and islanised the majority. Let alone permnant damage to Iraqi soil and foreign relations.
Stability? In order to maintain his corrupted way of governing he had to keep the oil prices high even if he had to provoke war for it
People? He got Iraq involved in so many scandals and wars he couldnt keep social benifits anymore no matter how much oil he had. Let alone the fact that he neglected Iraq and considering its huge oil reserves and small population was suppose to become super developed under any medicore leadership.
Also remember that social benifits started inbefore it and the reason he is remembered for it was because Iraq used to be poor nation before oil was disovered. Compared to poorer western nations its nothing impressive
West? He provoked 3 middle eastern conflict and even though he contributed to the arms industry planted the seeds for Al Qaeda and ISIS and funded terror everywhere
2. Could he maintain this system for long? History says nay
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
>history is written by the victors
>churchill
it was napoleon who said it first not some obese british drunkard.
Read the parenthesis, and stop making a fool out of yourself
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
Scris de Guest, 03.04.2018 at 04:05
See what Corrambo and Fappy posted, Saddam was loved in Iraq, and kept the region in check, him and Qaddafi have been falsely demonized
Then we have to answer two questions
1. Who was he good for?
For Iraq? We know he spent all its income for what turned out to be nothing and instead of developing society to nly devided and islanised the majority. Let alone permnant damage to Iraqi soil and foreign relations.
Stability? In order to maintain his corrupted way of governing he had to keep the oil prices high even if he had to provoke war for it
People? He got Iraq involved in so many scandals and wars he couldnt keep social benifits anymore no matter how much oil he had. Let alone the fact that he neglected Iraq and considering its huge oil reserves and small population was suppose to become super developed under any medicore leadership.
Also remember that social benifits started inbefore it and the reason he is remembered for it was because Iraq used to be poor nation before oil was disovered. Compared to poorer western nations its nothing impressive
West? He provoked 3 middle eastern conflict and even though he contributed to the arms industry planted the seeds for Al Qaeda and ISIS and funded terror everywhere
2. Could he maintain this system for long? History says nay
History is written by the victors as Churchill (? pretty sure it was him) once said. The view about Saddam today was more exaggerated than the reality and circunstance of facts I'd say, by the International Coalition and US that needed to legitimize the invasion.
>history is written by the victors
>churchill
it was napoleon who said it first not some obese british drunkard.
Read the parenthesis, and stop making a fool out of yourself
at least google, next time mr portuguese wanker
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
Scris de Waffel, 03.04.2018 at 08:02
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
napoleon raped half netherlands into submission
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 02:41
Scris de Waffel, 03.04.2018 at 08:02
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
napoleon raped half netherlands into submission
And it just shows how deep, by this 'hurtfull' comment
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
Scris de Waffel, 07.04.2018 at 07:01
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 02:41
Scris de Waffel, 03.04.2018 at 08:02
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
napoleon raped half netherlands into submission
And it just shows how deep, by this 'hurtfull' comment
no it just shows how many french retarded cells u have cunt
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 07:34
Scris de Waffel, 07.04.2018 at 07:01
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 02:41
Scris de Waffel, 03.04.2018 at 08:02
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
napoleon raped half netherlands into submission
And it just shows how deep, by this 'hurtfull' comment
no it just shows how many french retarded cells u have cunt
Oh really? I thought I was an immigrant according to you? , you sure don't seem to have it all under control, do you? Did you forget your meds?
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
This thread's still about Afrin right?
----
Someone Better Than You
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Soldier001 Cont șters |
Scris de Waffel, 07.04.2018 at 08:36
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 07:34
Scris de Waffel, 07.04.2018 at 07:01
Scris de Guest, 07.04.2018 at 02:41
Scris de Waffel, 03.04.2018 at 08:02
This subject is really deep for you isnt it, soldier?
napoleon raped half netherlands into submission
And it just shows how deep, by this 'hurtfull' comment
no it just shows how many french retarded cells u have cunt
Oh really? I thought I was an immigrant according to you? , you sure don't seem to have it all under control, do you? Did you forget your meds?
all fucking dutch must fucking hang
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|