RA needs a little boost

Currently: tanks 8 attack and 4 defense (-1 for att and def)

Some strat is always going to be OP.. and currently it's DS.
with the latsest update RA can't compete with it on an equal footing though and the latest updates are useless and completely out of line with the strategy, see below

Destroyers: 9/7, 11 range, 200 cost (+1 range and -50 cost)
Bombers: 6/5, 16 range, 130 cost (-1 defence, +1 range and -30 cost)

no one will ever use destroyers or bombers when they have cheaper, more effective tanks... those changes liken it more to imp than what it's suppose to be.

I propose returning tanks to 9 attack but keeping them on 4 defense (instead of the original 5)... players will know to rush tanks and recapping vs this strategy will remain easier. But to counter the strengh of DS and GW, some oomph in attack needs to be restored, what would be more constructive is making tanks +10 in cost and remove all the unnecessary crap above in order to restore its competitive edge... and hopefully making it a viable (again) but not overpowered option.

I know RA is still viable in many different situations, but it's not as competitive as it used to be, and right now it's one of the 4/5 weakest strats.

Restore balance to the force..
pretty please

Seems fine to me.

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

I wouldn't know about 3k but the last time I played 5k Greece RA destroyers were devastating against Ukraine who had Turkey. Overall I think RA is fine as it is. Its a very good situation strategy and rather OP when used right.

Before we rush into anything, just remember what happened last time we tried to give RA a little boost.

(For the record I agree , but I've hardly played RA since the change so my opinion is irrelevant)

Even more than fine, no need for boost

Stop being mad you lost to a r7 in a 3k duel. You by all people should know 3k's have everything to do with luck and nothing to do with skill.

You are asking from a expensive strategy to be effective in low fund games?
Sure...
Now please boost sm bombers by lowering the price because i cant spam enough of them in 3-5k games, ty.
And for what reasons ra ukr is bad now? If i understood right pd turkey is not really a story anymore after all the nerfs, so i dont see the problems vs imp. I dont see the problems vs pd neither.
Long story short, adapt.

N.

Ra seems fine


DS is OP but I wouldn't rush to nerfing it just yet, let's see how we adapt to it since we never really considered it as a competitive strat.

basically op ra had no counter but maybe op ds has

Scris de PleaseMe, 15.12.2015 at 12:25

Stop being mad you lost to a r7 in a 3k duel. You by all people should know 3k's have everything to do with luck and nothing to do with skill.

End rankism today. #allranksmatter

No, no it does not. It's still powerful in its current form. But why on earth should it be viable on 3k? This was the problem before, you could play it on any setting and wreck with it. RA is the lowest skill strat. Its a beginners strategy. We want players to grow and experience the other strats and dimensions of gameplay.

Also DS is not op. It's fantastic atm, i love that people are now using it. But it is still pretty easy to counter if you know what you are doing. The strategy that is probably the most out of wack at current is gw.

I played Turkey with RA when it got a boost (not sure on its current state... inactive for too long)... and it was great.

EDIT: or maybe im just fucking amazing
EDIT: yep prolly that

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

duel me 10k me ra ukr and u turk?

Scris de PleaseMe, 15.12.2015 at 12:25

Stop being mad you lost to a r7 in a 3k duel. You by all people should know 3k's have everything to do with luck and nothing to do with skill.

I'm not mad about losing to prometheus, I taught him how to play 3k.. you tool.

Scris de Goblin, 15.12.2015 at 14:55

I played Turkey with RA when it got a boost (not sure on its current state... inactive for too long)... and it was great.

EDIT: or maybe im just fucking amazing
EDIT: yep prolly that

Try and Play RA in a 3v3 now.. tell me how it goes

Personally I see no real issue with RA only WHY ON EARTH MILITIA THAT YOU GET IN ATKING COST SO DAMNED MUCH TO MAINTAIN

I understand want to lower defense since it's an atk based strat but punishing me for atking?

Scris de Phoenix, 15.12.2015 at 19:00

Try and Play RA in a 3v3 now.. tell me how it goes

Irrational idea that every strategy should be viable at any point at any given time with any given situation or country...

I thought this was a strategy game... but i guess you like to play a mage in a RPG and try to sneak attack a dragon with a Heavy Hammer and then get confused when you fail a sneak attack and your character cant swing the Hammer

Scris de Permamuted, 15.12.2015 at 13:48

No, no it does not. It's still powerful in its current form. But why on earth should it be viable on 3k? This was the problem before, you could play it on any setting and wreck with it. RA is the lowest skill strat. Its a beginners strategy. We want players to grow and experience the other strats and dimensions of gameplay.

Also DS is not op. It's fantastic atm, i love that people are now using it. But it is still pretty easy to counter if you know what you are doing. The strategy that is probably the most out of wack at current is gw.

agreed i will go ds to beat gw

Scris de Sultan of Swing, 15.12.2015 at 18:56

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

duel me 10k me ra ukr and u turk?

ok you go ra ukraine i go turkey I acept your challenge , i will play in 9 hour right now gotta goto school

Did anyone say challenge? I'm in.

Scris de Htin, 16.12.2015 at 06:18

Scris de Sultan of Swing, 15.12.2015 at 18:56

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

duel me 10k me ra ukr and u turk?

ok you go ra ukraine i go turkey I acept your challenge , i will play in 9 hour right now gotta goto school

ok I'm down

Scris de Goblin, 16.12.2015 at 06:11

Scris de Phoenix, 15.12.2015 at 19:00

Try and Play RA in a 3v3 now.. tell me how it goes

Irrational idea that every strategy should be viable at any point at any given time with any given situation or country...

I thought this was a strategy game... but i guess you like to play a mage in a RPG and try to sneak attack a dragon with a Heavy Hammer and then get confused when you fail a sneak attack and your character cant swing the Hammer

i've never played an Rpg

i dont see why strats need fucking with in the first place

Scris de Steve Aoki, 15.12.2015 at 12:37

You are asking from a expensive strategy to be effective in low fund games?
Sure...
Now please boost sm bombers by lowering the price because i cant spam enough of them in 3-5k games, ty.
And for what reasons ra ukr is bad now? If i understood right pd turkey is not really a story anymore after all the nerfs, so i dont see the problems vs imp. I dont see the problems vs pd neither.
Long story short, adapt.

no.. i actually asked that they be made +10 more expensive to counter the high damage.. learn to read fag

Scris de Phoenix, 16.12.2015 at 09:56

no.. i actually asked that they be made +10 more expensive to counter the high damage.. learn to read fag

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

Was just answering to this one.
Okay, then i want to make other proposition. Bring nukes as regular units. 250dmg, 100hp 'cause reasons, 4k cost.
And yes, already see how that works 'making them stronger but expensive'. Pick poland or even ukraine and use the money you have to spam 30 op RA tanks. Good thinking.

Scris de Steve Aoki, 16.12.2015 at 10:04

Scris de Phoenix, 16.12.2015 at 09:56

no.. i actually asked that they be made +10 more expensive to counter the high damage.. learn to read fag

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

Was just answering to this one.
Okay, then i want to make other proposition. Bring nukes as regular units. 250dmg, 100hp 'cause reasons, 4k cost.
And yes, already see how that works 'making them stronger but expensive'. Pick poland or even ukraine and use the money you have to spam 30 op RA tanks. Good thinking.

For fuck sake... read my post before you respond again you retard... they weren't unbearable before and if players realise tanks are weak they will rush them.. much like you can do with DS helicopters... omfg.

Scris de Phoenix, 16.12.2015 at 10:14

Scris de Steve Aoki, 16.12.2015 at 10:04

Scris de Phoenix, 16.12.2015 at 09:56

no.. i actually asked that they be made +10 more expensive to counter the high damage.. learn to read fag

Scris de Phoenix, 14.12.2015 at 23:44

Scris de Meester, 14.12.2015 at 23:28

Seems fine to me.

It's definitely not viable in 3k anymore, and RA ukraine in 10k sucks balls atm

Was just answering to this one.
Okay, then i want to make other proposition. Bring nukes as regular units. 250dmg, 100hp 'cause reasons, 4k cost.
And yes, already see how that works 'making them stronger but expensive'. Pick poland or even ukraine and use the money you have to spam 30 op RA tanks. Good thinking.

For fuck sake... read my post before you respond again you retard... they weren't unbearable before and if players realise tanks are weak they will rush them.. much like you can do with DS helicopters... omfg.

You fucking hairless retarded cunt with a vaginal infection (i like this one), you are trying to make something stupid look.. fuck it, its still stupid.
They weren't unbearable before? I assume that's the opinion of you, el fag, opi, critical etc? Wondering what you guys have in common. Cunts. Ra players. Blitz players..
Next.
Ra was shit unskilled strategy. It good boosted. RA transfered into op unskilled strategy. Got nerfed back and now you want history to repeat? yeah, i am going with this one. People usually learn from mistakes.
It's hard to read your posts fully because they doesnt make sense, they are just.. couple of random words with couple of random insults, yey.. Intelligent boy. If you read my posts normaly, i am just trying to give example.
New example: if someone picks RA (the new yours op RA), all the enemy had to do is to get lucky and rush with.. his units your stacks, right? And he win.
Now if enemy is gw/mos/imp or half of other strategies, or he is acrros the fucking map, hes gonna lose in 80% times if the ra is op again. Just a random number. Not really a statistic or something.
Go choke on your mothers dick is my new favorite insult for you.

Edit: yee i am done here, gl with ra.

Scris de Phoenix, 16.12.2015 at 09:52

i've never played an Rpg

ok... then you wouldnt use a fucking fire Pokemon to attack a Water one would you and complain how it cant beat it!!!!

EDIT:

Scris de Goblin, 16.12.2015 at 10:58

I am a simple man. I see Goblin post, i upvote.

Too many isolated little bum boys in this game