Ouch Postări: 72 De la: USA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d35f0/d35f0b6ede30c5d5383d41be6ae702e2c8d5ce78" alt="" |
It is a good idea to the fact that submarines dont have a great capacity currently anyways...
----
-Man on a Mission
AkA berserk
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Homero Postări: 78 De la: Polonia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e28/f5e28aff33d8c90397c56695c678097e1dd8e55a" alt="" |
I would leave subs capacity where it is. They can transport 4 with MoS which I feel it's all right already.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
Homero Postări: 78 De la: Polonia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e28/f5e28aff33d8c90397c56695c678097e1dd8e55a" alt="" |
Well maybe because AT primary role is to transport. Subs main role is surprise attack (in theory). Transport option is somehow a bonus like for helicopters in DS, and I know that in practice subs are just stealth transports rarely used for attacks but that doesn't mean they should be underwater transport for 4-5 units with 7 or 9 attack and stealth. If we go with capacity II why not make them benefit from Safer Transportation's +3 HP?
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Its ok how it is 5 is just no needed
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|