Dear AtWar team
Postări: 42
Vizitat de: 80 users
Hey, I've been thinking about how cool this game would be with some added features and updates to it.
Resources, instead of just money would be a really nice thing to add, like maybe food for soldier upkeep, oil/fuel for vehicle upkeep, and maybe even boasted unit stats for more well fed armies (eg: a bit more movement/A/D on an army well fed). More detailed city sieges would also be cool, like having the ability to cut off an army's resource supply inside a city to starve them or even making a whole new supply route system that enables you to cut off an enemies army from resources giving them worse stats etc, this would also make the game a lot more realistic and fun to play... These are just brief ideas and anyone else feel free to post your ideas here for what you think could make this game better. Thanks!
-Cameron.
Resources, instead of just money would be a really nice thing to add, like maybe food for soldier upkeep, oil/fuel for vehicle upkeep, and maybe even boasted unit stats for more well fed armies (eg: a bit more movement/A/D on an army well fed). More detailed city sieges would also be cool, like having the ability to cut off an army's resource supply inside a city to starve them or even making a whole new supply route system that enables you to cut off an enemies army from resources giving them worse stats etc, this would also make the game a lot more realistic and fun to play... These are just brief ideas and anyone else feel free to post your ideas here for what you think could make this game better. Thanks!
-Cameron.
man your post has like 2 upvotes yet you still keep supporting your BAD ideas.We like atwar as it is we dont want it to become RP.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
As an optional extra for those that would like these kind of features for custom map's, it could be a good idea. Just because I support an idea, doesn't mean it will happen, I am also guessing isn't possible due to programming/timescales - I am showing encouragement to those that have expressed an idea to help the game, which would add more diversity to atWar. Sorry to see you don't like that. Furthermore you have played 3 custom map's in 300 days, why would you even have an opinion on this? 
---- intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
just because is not a priority doesn't mean is a bad idea. Custom Resources are likely to happen in the future, its just a matter of when.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
i didnt talk about custom maps i talked about standard map.And to catch up i havent played custom maps for a long time but I used to.Also i think you were the one who said that "scenarios are for noobs".
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Reading through I can't see where you have said anything about the standard map. I was referring to custom maps which I said as 'an option' 3 times in this thread.
---- intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
If it is an option for mapmakers i dont really mind even if i think that kind of maps will be retarted and cancer like RP.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
|
Personally I find it pointless. You can add it if you're bored and have nothing to do (but you do have something to do, fix the fucking editor) but I doubt it would help much. Tags should get priority, though. Tags are more important than some people think, because sometimes factions that should be merged are divided due to units, like in Pyrrhus' WW2 Finland was meant to be part of Axis Minors but was seperated due to units.
---- Someone Better Than You
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Ahahahaha hit the nail on the head
---- https://gyazo.com/1c8796f336012b736fc498c74ea7005f
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Tunder : just because is not a priority doesn't mean is a bad idea. Custom Resources are likely to happen in the future, its just a matter of when.
---- https://gyazo.com/1c8796f336012b736fc498c74ea7005f
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
|
I dislike this suggestion. When i want more economic, i play europa universalis or hearts of iron!
---- "War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means." ― Carl von Clausewitz
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
you could make the same argument for anything. "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play on a ww2 setting i would rather play hearts of iron!" "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play ww1 i would play hearts of iron!" "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play as napoleon i would play March of the eagles!" "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play in colonial era i would play europa Universalies!" "i dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play roman maps i would play EU:Rome or Rome total war!" "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play space maps i would play warhammer40k or sterallis or masters of orion, or starruler 2.0" 'I dislike custom maps, if i wanted to play on modern world i would play Wargames: European Escalation!" "I dislike custom maps, if i wanted something more simple i would play risk!" "I dislike x, if i wanted to do y i would play z" you don't play custom maps anyways, so why do you care if admins added custom resources to custom maps? this idea won't affect the meta-game at all.
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
|
Then please read the threads before debating with your pearls of wisdom and try to keep forum feedback constructive.
---- intelligence + imagination = extraordinary result
Se încarcă...
Se încarcă...
|
- 1
- 2
