Scris de WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 22:14
Scris de WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 16:09
Scris de WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 14:53
Scris de WHlTE, 14.01.2021 at 11:15
Scris de WHlTE, 13.01.2021 at 21:35
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T WALK INTO THE CAPITOL FOR A FEW HOURS! WHAT ABOUT MY WHOLESOME SENATOR? YOU'RE LITERALLY TRYING TO START A COUP!
Guns, people die because of the guns the trump supporters used, ladder, battering rams, paintball guns and forcefully entering into somewhere were elected officials work.
Totally not a third world country action at all. Oh no no, totally not.....
in a third world shithole (like Ireland) the docile people sit there and consume while rich people in government rob them
Trump is a billionaire and keeps giving money to Israel and keeps provoking your own democracy... Hypocritical mate...
Trumps net worth has dropped ever since he entered office, ""democracy"" america is ruled by lobbyists, each senator/congressman/president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media, America isnt a "democracy" whatever president you pick, whatever congressmen you pick, whatever senator you pick they push their agenda.
So do you suggest that his nett worth dropped because of his presidency or is there another correlated factor? Such as the coronapandemic?
When the pandemic is over, dont u think his nett worth will be increased back to pre- pandemic levels?
I still dont get how youre assuming that his presidency affected his net worth.
Shouldnt there be other factors that affect his assets etc.
You do know he wasnt president before 2016 and his nett worth dropped massively as well.
I would even suggest that his nett worth benefitted from his presidency, and it didnt decline further due to his presidency.
He cant run his business of real estate while being president, he also spends some of the money campaigning.
then why would u previously suggest that it had something to do with how "democracy" america is ruled by lobbyists, and each senator/ congressman/ president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media.
Now youre saying he doesnt need those funds hence he is campaigning and because his son is or whoever is controlling his business and not him.
What is it? U probably have no idea how to make your point.
Trump invested $66 million in 2016 in his campaign https://fortune.com/2016/12/09/donald-trump-campaign-spending/
And i guess i dont need to tell you that he invested less in 2020.
>Now youre saying he doesnt need those funds hence he is campaigning.
When did i ever say that?
>then why would u previously suggest that it had something to do with how "democracy" america is ruled by lobbyists, and each senator/ congressman/ president needs to favour the lobbyists to attract funds and not get attacked by the media.
This is true, dont know what you are trying to point out.
>Trump invested $66 million in 2016 in his campaign https://fortune.com/2016/12/09/donald-trump-campaign-spending/
"He also spends ***some of his money campaigning****"
Now exactly tell me how his presidency influenced his nett worth to lose from over $4 billion to less than $2.5 billion in just 4 years.
He didnt run his business, it was left to his son, who is less experienced in running a billion dollar company then his father, his father couldnt run the business since he got elected as president, he cant run his company and be president.
So it had nothing to do with factors such as financial trust, financial markets, financial bubbles etc etc.
But majority if not everything had to do because his son is inexperienced and did a terrible job, while Trump could have retained the $2 billion nett loss.
(as if Trump always manages every asset/ business he owns)
Seems to me that you have no idea how economics work and that your arguments just fail.
If you said something which had some economic argument, such as his value drops because people after his presidency do not like him and dont want to be associated with him. Then i would have understood it.
His assets after all, are his brands name. By having one of the most negative presidency ever, it is obvious his brand would lose value.